Monthly Archive for October, 2010

World crisis in humanities, not many hurt

not-for-profit-why-democracy-needs-the-humanities

By Matthew Reisz at The Times Higher Education

It is precisely because Martha Nussbaum is so obviously one of the stars of the American academy that many people will be inclined to sit up and listen when she produces “a call to action” about “a worldwide crisis in education”.

Her new book, Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities, certainly pulls no punches. “We are in the midst of a crisis of massive proportions and grave global significance,” she writes, “a crisis that goes largely unnoticed, like a cancer; a crisis that is likely to be, in the long run, far more damaging to the future of democratic self-government (than the economic crisis of 2008).”

She fears that current major trends within education are “producing a greedy obtuseness and a technically trained docility that threaten the very life of democracy itself”, and that “all modern societies are rapidly losing the battle, as they feed the forces that lead to violence and dehumanisation”. At stake is whether we are going to end up with “a world that is worth living in”. More…

Lunching on Olympus

steven_isenberg

From Steven L. Isenberg at The American Scholar

The British writers W. H. Auden, E. M. Forster, Philip Larkin, and William Empson paid respectful attention to each other: Larkin wrote “English Auden was a superb and magnetic wide-angled poet, but the poetry was in the blaming and the warning.” Empson thought Auden a “wonderful poet” and put Larkin among the “very good poets.” Auden wrote a sonnet for Forster, and Empson wrote a poem called “Just a Smack at Auden.” Forster’s novels were touchstones for Auden, who cabled “Morgan” Forster on his 80th birthday these good wishes: “May you long continue what you already are stop old famous loved yet not yet a sacred cow.” Empson thought Forster’s Aspects of the Novel—lectures he had heard as a student at Cambridge—“a model.”

For me the four have another thing in common, the unlikely and unexpected occasions of my having met each of them for lunch. Those visits are always with me, and while I kept no diary and so remember fewer of their words than I wish, the memories I do have are testimony to their humanity and kindness. More…

Humanities Journal, Volume 8, Number 5 now available

humanities_front

The fifth issue of Volume 8 of The International Journal of the Humanitieshas now been published.

Volume 8, Number 5 contains:

Continue reading ‘Humanities Journal, Volume 8, Number 5 now available’

A vote for political incorrectness

20101023_bkp501

From The Economist

The task of the Man Booker judges every year is to pick the best novel by a writer from Britain and the Commonwealth that has been published between October 1st and September 30th. In fact, the job is even more demanding than that. The judges are given five months to read upwards of 150 books, then they reread the longlist of 12 and, in a final round, go back once more over the shortlist of six.

The Man Booker is not so much a contest of literary merit as a test of indestructibility, the sort meted out to running shoes, Land Rovers and toys for small boys. The winner is the book that takes the longest time to fall apart.

In a strong year, the multiple readings are a crucial final slugging it out. Even in a thin year, such as 2010, they help speed the process by reinforcing decisiveness. This year the judges reached their conclusion in just an hour, and spent the rest of the afternoon drinking tea and waiting to put on their dinner suits. More…

Latest papers in the Humanities Journal

humanities_front

The most recent issue of The International Journal of the Humanities includes:

Recently published in the Humanities Journal

humanitiesThe most recent issue, Volume 8, Number 4, of The International Journal of the Humanities includes:

The Place of the Humanities

4990488655_e57b51aeed

From Ryan Griffs at IPRH

We drive a “hybrid” automobile. A 2008 Toyota Prius, to be more precise. It operates on what’s called a “Synergy Drive,” which I think means that it switches between using the gas-powered engine and an electric battery to move the car. We have been using this car a lot to carry ourselves and electronic recording equipment to Beardstown, IL—digital video cameras, solid-state audio recorders, microphones along with all the usual stuff like cell phones. The “we” includes my collaborator and spouse Sarah Ross. We’re working on a long term experimental documentary project that is in part about this smallish town on the Illinois River and its place in a contemporary and historical global political ecology. I could tell you the make and model of the recording equipment, but have decided that it matters less than the make of the car. I could be wrong about this, but we spend as much time in the car as we do using any of the recording gear. More…

Has any author’s reputation fallen further or faster than Dostoevsky’s?

fyodor-dostoyevsky-006

From the Books Blog at The Guardian

My favourite Russian author is Dostoevsky, whose best books are not just profound examinations of the human soul etc, but also nasty, violent, ironic, caustic, and (at times) extremely funny. Recently I picked up Henri Troyat’s Firebrand which is an old-fashioned, novelistic account of FD’s life. It’s a great read, so much so that I decided to ride the wave of pleasure and seize the moment to simultaneously plough through some of the heavier Dostoevsky tomes sitting on my shelves, including the selected letters and the joyless prose of Konstantin Mochulsky’s critical biography. (I’m saving Joseph Frank’s five-volume epic for later).

It’s fascinating to observe how both the racy volume and dryly critical work were constructed from the same source materials. Meanwhile I have been reminded of Dostoevsky’s dramatic life story: his father’s murder; his mock execution and exile; his gambling madness; and his calamitous debut on the St Petersburg literary scene. For those who don’t know the story, Dostoevsky’s first novel Poor Folk was passed before publication to a legendary critic/blowhard called Vissarion Belinsky who promptly declared that Dostoevsky was the heir to Gogol. This was nonsense: Poor Folk is a mawkish tale that would have been forgotten had the same author not also written Crime and Punishment et al. Still, the 24-year-old Fedya D was suddenly feted everywhere as the new literary genius of St Petersburg. It went to his head and he soon became insufferable, alienating all his new literary “friends”, who revenged themselves when he published his second novel, The Double. Not merely trashed, the book was denounced. Dostoevsky became a bad joke. More…

On “Miscellany”

6a00d8341c562c53ef013487bec36c970c-800wi

From Akeel Bilgrami at 3quarksdaily.com

The notion of a miscellany fetches no particular interest, except in the light of its contrasting ideal of integrity. I don’t mean integrity in the moral sense–a person’s action keeping faith with her principles– but in the stricter sense of things being of a piece, being integrated rather than miscellaneous.

The intellectual pleasures offered by literature tend to be inherently miscellaneous, while science and philosophy are marked by a drive towards integrity, towards eliminating the element of miscellany.  For someone given to both literature and philosophy, as I have been from an early age, each of these contrasting satisfactions can provide a sort of relief and release from the other.

It is often asked: what is the difference between imaginative literature and other sorts of intellectual endeavor?  Are there any kinds of knowledge uniquely available, say, from novels and poems? Why do we read them when we could read books in psychology, sociology, moral philosophyespecially if these are illustrated with vivid examples of ethical, psychological, and social experience?  There are many possible answers to such a question, and I want to explore only one of them, the one that has to do with the contrast between the miscellaneous and the integrated. More…

When Baghdad was centre of the scientific world

bab-al-sharqi-district-of-006

By Jim Al-Khalili at The Observer

The Bab al-Sharji district in the centre of Baghdad derives its name, which means east gate, from the medieval fortifications of the city. These walls were probably built around the first half of the 10th century. During the brief British stay at the end of the first world war, its gatehouse was used as a garrison church. Nothing of those medieval walls, or the east gate, remains today; I remember Bab al-Sharji as a sprawling, noisy and bustling square, with its food stalls and secondhand record shops scattered around the busy bus depot and taxi ranks. But its name is a reminder of the expansion and transformation of this proud city over the years since its foundation in AD762 as the new seat of power of the mighty Abbasid empire. Indeed, no other city on Earth has had to put up with the levels of death and destruction that Baghdad has endured over the centuries. And yet, as the capital of one of the world’s great empires, this was the richest, proudest, most supercilious city on the planet for half a millennium.

Exactly 1,200 years after its foundation, I was born in Karradat Mariam, a Shia district of Baghdad with a large Christian community, a stone’s throw away from today’s Green Zone and a few miles south of the spot where one of Baghdad’s most famous rulers was born in 786. His name was Ab? Ja’far al-Ma’m?n. Half Arab, half Persian, this enigmatic caliph was destined to become the greatest patron of science in the cavalcade of Islamic rulers, and the person responsible for initiating the world’s most impressive period of scholarship and learning since Ancient Greece. More...