Monthly Archive for March, 2011

Latest papers in the Humanities Journal

humanities

The most recent issue of The International Journal of the Humanities includes:

Finalists for the International Award for Excellence

Congratulations to all of the finalists for the International Award for Excellence in the area of new directions in the humanities:

Announcing the Winner of the International Award for Excellence

Congratulations to Suzanne S. Choo the winner of the International Award for Excellence in the area of new directions in the humanities with her paper Cultivating Moral Sensibilities through Aesthetic Education: The Power of Everyday Cosmopolitanism.

Abstract: In considering the brutal reality of the Holocaust, this paper begins by examining the startling paradox in Immanuel Kant’s claim that exposure to the beautiful can cultivate moral sensibilities. The paper proceeds to argue that Kant’s aesthetic grounding in subjective universality not only rationalizes how the beautiful can foster an attunement towards moral purposes, it also highlights how the transition from sensible to supersensible can be obstructed when it is not framed by disinterestedness. This then provides powerful implications for the mediation of aesthetic education as a catalyst in facilitating the symbolic transition from engaging in the beautiful to engaging in moral contemplation. At the same time, such a transition presents a dilemma for aesthetic education since it seems inconceivable to argue that the cultivation of aesthetic judgment in the artificial setting of a classroom should be driven purely by disinterestedness.

Artist Unknown: The original portrait of William Shakespeare

From Morgan Meis at The Smart Set

We know him not at all, and yet completely. That has always been the paradox of William Shakespeare. The characters he created in his plays have worked their way into the collective DNA of the English-speaking world, of Western culture broadly considered, and of world culture through Western culture. The language of Shakespeare — that unique and startling way he had of phrasing things–has become the common currency of thinking, acting, being. But we don’t know much about his life. We know the basic details: born in Stratford-upon-Avon in 1564, married Anne Hathaway in 1582, died in 1616. Beyond that, he is a mystery. We don’t have any information that explains how he could have had such an immense and lasting influence, an influence that only seems to grow, century after century. When you reflect on it for a moment, it doesn’t seem possible that one person could have created Hamlet, King Lear, Macbeth, the Sonnets, etc. (to even attempt to make a list of Shakespeare’s greatness is absurd). Is there any other literary figure, any non-religious figure of nay kind so utterly essential to the world as we know it? Maybe Shakespeare is the only one.

This explains, I think, the suspicions regarding Shakespeare’s true identity that have percolated ever since the man died. We’ve been told that Shakespeare was actually Christopher Marlowe or Francis Bacon. We’ve been told that he was Edward de Vere, or some other English nobleman in disguise. The details of these various theories don’t matter so much. The point is the disbelief, the sense that Shakespeare can’t just be Shakespeare. More…

Recently published in the Humanities Journal

humanities

The most recent issue of The International Journal of the Humanities includes:

Humanities Journal, Volume 8, Number 11 now available

humanities_frontThe eleventh issue of Volume 8 of The International Journal of the Humanities has now been published.

Volume 8, Number 11 contains:

Continue reading ‘Humanities Journal, Volume 8, Number 11 now available’

The future of the English language

From Kerstin Hoge at The Sunday Times

In the British film Code 46 of 2003, the director Michael Winterbottom creates a visually and verbally hybrid world for a dystopian love story. Cityscapes are an architectural collage of Shanghai, Dubai and London’s Jubilee Line, simultaneously recognizable and alien, and are populated by speakers of a world language that mixes English with Spanish, Mandarin Chinese and Persian. The linguistic hybridization signals that in the world of Code 46 the balance of economic and political power has shifted away from English-speaking nations and hence English is no longer quite the global force to which we have become accustomed.

While tapping current anxieties about the future of the West, the diminished role of English that is anticipated in Winterbottom’s film might seem as far-fetched as the biotechnological inventions that it also features. The dominance of English today as the language of business, science and popular entertainment appears unassailed and perhaps unassailable. For the linguist David Crystal, it is entirely plausible that “English, in some shape or form, will find itself in the service of the world community for ever”. In his new, engaging and learned book, The Last Lingua Franca, Nicholas Ostler challenges this widespread confidence in the continued future of English as the dominant global language, and, more radically, questions whether there will be any need at all for a single language of international communication “in a world where digital technology is cheap and ubiquitous”. More…

(Image Credit)

The Value of Being Befuddled, Occasionally. Or, the Attempt to Live a Life of Constant and Eager Observation

Tom Jacobs at 3quarksdaily.com

…our image of happiness is indissolubly bound up with the image of redemption.  The same applies to our view of the past, which is the concern of history.  The past carries with it a temporal index by which it is referred to redemption.

–Walter Benjamin, “Theses on the Philosophy of History” (1940)

DIALECTICAL THINGS

The fourth floor of the New-York Historical Society houses the Henry Luce III Center for the Study of American Culture, a collection encompassing over 40,000 objects spanning from prehistorical to 21st century New York.  By adopting an “open storage” policy, the NYHS has opened what would otherwise be a warehouse to the public, so that the miles of shelved artifacts that would normally be languishing unseen in a storage area on the fourth-floor can now be observed (albeit, without placards or captions). Unless one consults the computer databases, one is left pretty much on one’s own to make sense of what one is seeing.  This can be a productive scene of fascination, recognition, and misrecognition. More…